Krista's doctoral dissertation research investigates how historic urban neighborhoods, shaped by decades of structural racism and resistance, are being redeveloped as centers for innovation-driven economic development. Drawing from past professional experience, comparative case studies, in-depth interviews, and geographical surveys, this research conceptualizes urban innovation districts as both dialectical landscapes struggling to achieve social and spatial justice within a neoliberal economic framework, and as relational spaces produced and transformed by evolving power relations shaped by contested place identities. Findings from this research aim to advance urban planning theories and methods that help create more just and equitable communities.
Two emerging innovation districts in downtown Birmingham, Alabama serve as comparative case studies: The Switch, located adjacent to the City's historic African American 4th Ave. Business District (pictured above), and Edgehill at Southtown, located on the former site a historically segregated low-income neighborhood.
Development of these two emerging innovation districts is influenced by the place identities have been co-constituted within historic spatial processes shaped by racism, dating back to the city’s founding. Investigating their current production through qualitative and quantitative methods provides insights into the way place is conceptualized by the stakeholders involved and illuminates the complex and often conflicting social, political, and economic ideologies that shape their development.
The Purple Places Project builds upon a geographic inventory of institutional coalitions and emerging innovation districts throughout the U.S., which aims to illuminate the magnitude of social and spatial equity challenges inherent to this form of urbanism. A work in progress, this basemap displays district adjacency to predominantly BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) and low-income neighborhoods, historically redlined neighborhoods, Justice40 Districts, and neighborhoods that have been subject to past displacement due to urban renewal. It is intended to bring attention to place-based inequities and the ongoing displacement risk of existing populations to the institutions involved in their placemaking, as well as opportunities for inclusion and integration. Findings from this inventory and the case studies will help inform planning theories and methods designed to achieve more equitable development in other innovation communities.
Henri Lefebvre
Urban innovation districts are distinctive ecosystems rooted in place. As defined by the Global Institute on Innovation Districts, they are dense hubs of activity where physical, economic, and networking assets combine with an entrepreneurial culture to form a synergistic relationship between people, firms, and place. Over the past decade much research has focused on the growth of this form of urbanism, its role in driving placed-based and technology-driven economic development, and the combination of assets that must be leveraged for economic growth to occur. For more information, see: Katz, B. and Wagner, J. (2014). "The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America,” Brookings; and Katz, B. and Wagner, J. (2024). “The Next Wave of Innovation Districts,” Global Institute of Innovation Districts.
The color purple embodies the political tensions between free-market neoliberalism privileging private property and corporate wealth accumulation, and progressive urbanism centering social justice, spatial equity, and community wealth building. It can also symbolize the blending of historically racialized binaries and defiance against systemic racism, representing the strength and dignity of marginalized communities reclaiming space and agency.